| Metric | Formula | Strong | Adequate | Danger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leverage | Total Debt / EBITDA | < 3x | 3–5x | > 5x |
| Interest Coverage | EBITDA / Interest Expense | > 4x | 2–3x | < 2x |
| Liquidity | Cash + Revolver / Near-term Maturities | > 1.5x | 1.0–1.5x | < 1.0x |
Leverage = Total Debt / EBITDA
Watch the trend, not just the level. A company at 3x leverage and improving is healthier than one at 3x and deteriorating. Credit is about trajectory — where the metrics are heading matters as much as where they are today.
Going Deeper — five hidden debt items investors miss. Reported debt / EBITDA understates true leverage when the balance sheet excludes: (1) capitalized operating leases (material for retailers and airlines), (2) pension and OPEB underfunding (PBO − plan assets), (3) finance-subsidiary debt at auto OEMs and equipment makers, (4) trade payables stretched well beyond industry-norm DPO, (5) factored / securitized receivables held off balance sheet. Worked example: a 3.5x reported leverage ratio with $800M of pension underfunding on $400M of EBITDA is actually 5.5x adjusted leverage — a meaningfully different credit profile.
Sit with the ideas.
Company A: 6x leverage, 1.5x interest coverage, $200M cash, $500M debt due in 12 months. Company B: 4x leverage, 3x interest coverage, $1B cash, no debt due for 3 years. Which is higher credit risk?