Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.12 · BEGINNER · 2 MIN
Sequence-of-Returns Risk
Two investors can earn the same AVERAGE return over 30 years and end up with very different amounts -- because the ORDER of returns matters once you are adding or withdrawing money. That is sequence-of-returns risk. It is usually discussed for retirees (a crash early in retirement, while withdrawing, can permanently shrink a portfolio), but it also shapes how much an early-career saver should worry about big early drops.
A 40% drop on $5,000 is $2,000; you keep buying cheap -- order barely matters, and a crash is a gift
Late accumulation (large balance)
A 40% drop on $500,000 is $200,000, with less time to recover before you need it
Early retirement (withdrawing)
Selling into a crash locks in losses -- the most dangerous window
§ 02
For a young saver, sequence risk is mostly good news: early crashes let you buy years of cheap shares, and you have decades to recover. The risk grows as your balance grows and your horizon shrinks -- which is exactly why the glide path (fpb-4) shifts you toward bonds as you approach the date you will need the money.
§ 03
Notice your own reaction the next time the market drops 20%. If you are decades from needing the money, that drop is lowering the price of your future shares -- a feature, not a bug.
§ 04
You cannot control the sequence of returns, but you can control the two things that defang it: keep enough in bonds and cash as you near your goal, and never be a forced seller in a downturn. Sequence risk punishes forced sellers, not patient holders.
§ 05
Why is a market crash early in your career far less dangerous than one just before you need the money?