The maturity table: the real cash ramp
The centerpiece disclosure is a schedule of undiscounted future lease payments: one line for each of the next five years, a 'thereafter' line for everything beyond, a total, and then a reconciling line — 'less: imputed interest' — that discounts the total down to the lease liability on the balance sheet. This table is where the truth about escalations lives. The income statement shows one level number under straight-line rent; the maturity table shows the actual contractual ramp, year by year. When next year's payment line is well above this year's lease cost, the company's cash rent is climbing regardless of what the expense line implies.
A sample lease maturity table
| Footnote line | Amount ($M) |
|---|---|
| 2027 | $120 |
| 2028 | $125 |
| 2029 | $131 |
| 2030 | $137 |
| 2031 | $143 |
| Thereafter | $244 |
| Total undiscounted payments | $900 |
| Less: imputed interest | ($180) |
| Lease liability (present value) | $720 |
The two weighted averages
Below the maturity table sit two single numbers that summarize the whole lease book. The weighted-average remaining lease term tells you how long the obligations run — a 12-year average reads very differently from a 3-year one when a business model is under pressure. The weighted-average discount rate is the rate used in the present-value math; for most tenants it is the incremental borrowing rate, the rate they would pay to borrow the money secured by the leased asset, because a landlord's implicit rate is rarely knowable. The rate deserves a skeptical look: the higher the assumed rate, the smaller the reported liability. Compare it to the yield on the company's own bonds — a discount rate far above the company's evident cost of debt is quietly shrinking the lease liability.
What still stays off the balance sheet
The lease liability is a floor, not a ceiling. Three real obligations remain outside it. Variable lease payments — percentage rent tied to a store's sales, or inflation-index increases above the rate locked at commencement — are expensed as incurred and never enter the liability; for a mall retailer paying percentage rent, a meaningful slice of true rent lives here. Short-term leases of twelve months or less can be kept off the balance sheet by election. And signed-but-not-commenced leases — the store fleet a growing chain has committed to but not yet opened — appear only as a disclosed commitment. All three show up in the footnote's lease cost table and commitments text, which is why the note, not the balance sheet, is the complete picture.
The lease cost table
The footnote also itemizes the period's total lease cost: operating lease cost (the level, straight-lined figure), finance lease amortization and interest, short-term lease cost, variable lease cost, and any sublease income netted against it all. Two comparisons earn their keep. Variable lease cost against operating lease cost shows how much of the company's rent is performance-linked and invisible to the liability. And total lease cost against cash paid for leases (disclosed in the same note or the cash flow supplement) echoes the straight-lining gap — the same expense-versus-cash timing difference that once lived in the deferred rent account.
Walk one real lease footnote
Transparency has edges
What the balance sheet still misses
Where this fits in the lease series
This lesson closes the lease-accounting series anchored by the main lease accounting module. The level-expense rule whose cash ramp the maturity table reveals is covered in straight-line rent; the timing accounts it produces are covered in deferred rent and prepaid rent.
Sit with the ideas.
A lease footnote shows total undiscounted future payments of $900M and a lease liability of $720M. What explains the $180M difference?