Skip to main content Skip to main content
Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.3 · INTERMEDIATE · 2 MIN

Stock-Based Compensation: The Hidden Cost

Many companies pay employees partly in stock instead of cash. This stock-based compensation (SBC) is a real cost that dilutes existing shareholders.

Quiz · 5 questions ↓

Three ways to view stock-based pay

PerspectiveSBC Is...Why
GAAP accountingAn expense on the income statementReduces reported earnings
Cash flow statementAdded back (non-cash expense)No cash left the company
Shareholder valueA real cost via dilutionMore shares = each existing share worth less

Why adjusted earnings that exclude stock mislead

Some tech companies report strong 'adjusted earnings' by excluding SBC. But if a company pays $1B in stock compensation, that is $1B of value transferred from shareholders to employees. It is real.

Compare stock pay to net income

Look up a tech company like GOOG or META. Check the SBC expense in the financials. Compare it to net income. Is it material?

Why free cash flow should not ignore stock pay

Free cash flow that ignores SBC overstates true owner earnings. Always check SBC as a percentage of revenue. Above 10% is a yellow flag.

Does adding back stock pay give true earnings?

A tech company reports $500M net income, $200M of which is stock-based compensation (SBC) added back to calculate non-GAAP earnings. Is $700M the true earnings?
Check your understanding

Sit with the ideas.

Company A reports $500M operating cash flow (which includes a $200M add-back of stock-based compensation) and spent $150M on capex. Treating SBC as a real cost, what is its SBC-adjusted free cash flow?

Why:
Continue this lesson in the app →See it on a real ticker →