Skip to main content Skip to main content
Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.8 · INTERMEDIATE · 2 MIN

Building a BDC Watchlist

A disciplined BDC investor ranks names on five criteria: (1) NAV discount/premium, (2) non-accrual rate, (3) NII dividend coverage, (4) leverage vs regulatory limit, and (5) manager track record. Top decile on all five = core holding. Weak on two or more = avoid until thesis changes.

Quiz · 5 questions ↓

Key point

Build the ranking once, then rerun it every quarter post-earnings. The score moves slowly -- changes signal real shifts.

Compare

TierExamplesProfile
Top-tier (core)ARCC, BXSL, OBDC, HTGCStrong manager, low non-accruals, covered dividend
Mid-tier (tactical)OCSL, TSLX, GBDCSolid but more volatile or smaller scale
Contrarian / valueDiscounted but stable NAV namesHigher reward, higher work required
AvoidSub-90% NAV + 5%+ non-accrualsPersistent quality issues

Try it

In the BDC view (/?view=bdc), build a 5-name watchlist using these tiers. Track price-to-NAV, yield, and non-accrual every quarter.

Key insight

The first profile checks every box: modest premium (market trusts marks), low non-accruals, dividend more than covered by NII, conservative leverage, and a long manager track record. This is the ARCC / BXSL playbook. The second is a value trap waiting to cut its dividend; the third is unproven and overpriced. The discipline is to insist that all five criteria — discount, non-accruals, coverage, leverage, manager — are in the healthy range before sizing a core holding; weak on two or more is reason to wait for the thesis to change.

Check-in

You're building a BDC watchlist. Criteria to prioritize?
Check your understanding

Sit with the ideas.

Which BDC profile is the strongest core holding candidate?

Why:
Continue this lesson in the app →See it on a real ticker →