Skip to main content Skip to main content
Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.6 · INTERMEDIATE · 2 MIN

Leverage and Regulatory Limits

BDCs are regulated under the 1940 Act, which limits leverage. Historically the limit was 1:1 debt-to-equity (200% asset coverage). The 2018 Small Business Credit Availability Act reduced required asset coverage to 150%, allowing 2:1 debt-to-equity for BDCs whose boards or shareholders approve.

Quiz · 5 questions ↓
§ 01

Higher leverage amplifies yield in good times and accelerates NAV destruction in bad times. 2008 wiped out several over-levered BDCs; 2020 stressed more.

§ 02
Leverage regimeMax debt / equityAsset coverageRisk profile
Pre-2018 (legacy)1.0x200%Conservative
Post-SBCAA (modern)2.0x150%Higher yield, more risk
With SBIC subsidiaryExcludes SBA debtEffective ~2.25xCheap gov-backed leverage
§ 03
In ARCC's filings, find the asset coverage ratio. Anything below 165-170% means cushion is thin and a downturn could force forced asset sales.
§ 04

With 1.5x debt-to-equity, every dollar of equity supports $2.50 of assets. A 10% asset value loss = $0.25 hit per dollar of equity = ~25% NAV decline. This is why BDC leverage matters so much. Pre-2008, several BDCs ran 1.5-2x and were wipe

§ 05
A BDC just increased regulatory leverage from 1.2x to 1.7x (debt/equity). Management says this boosts ROE. Honest assessment?
Five questions · AI feedback

Sit with the ideas.

A BDC operates at 1.5x debt-to-equity. The portfolio loses 10% of value. Roughly what happens to NAV per share?

Why:
See it on a real ticker →