Skip to main content Skip to main content
Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.3 · INTERMEDIATE · 2 MIN

Term Sheets: What Founders Give Up and Investors Demand

A term sheet is a non-binding agreement outlining the key economic and control terms of a VC investment. Every clause shifts risk between founders and investors — understanding what you’re giving up is as important as the valuation.

Quiz · 5 questions ↓

Compare

TermWhat It MeansWho It Protects
Liquidation preferenceInvestors get their money back first in any exitInvestors — downside protection
Anti-dilutionAdjusts price if future rounds are at lower valuationInvestors — protection against down rounds
Board seatsVoting control at the board levelDepends on allocation — key control term
Pro-rata rightsRight to invest in future rounds to maintain ownership %Investors — maintain exposure to winners
Drag-alongMajority can force minority to sell in an acquisitionInvestors — prevents holdouts from blocking exits
VestingFounder shares vest over 4 years with 1-year cliffCompany/investors — prevents founder walkaway

Key point

Liquidation preference is the most impactful term. A 1x non-participating preference means investors get their money back OR convert to common — fair. A 2x participating preference means they get 2x their money PLUS their pro-rata share of remaining proceeds — heavily investor-favored.

Try it

When reading about VC deals, check for ‘participating preferred’ vs. ‘non-participating preferred.’ The difference can dramatically change how proceeds are split in an exit.

Check-in

An investor puts in $10M for 20% with 1x non-participating liquidation preference. The company sells for $30M. What does the investor get?

Key insight

The headline valuation is often less important than the terms. A $50M valuation with 2x participating preferred and full ratchet anti-dilution may be worse for founders than a $30M valuation with clean 1x non-participating terms.

Check-in

Series B term sheet offers $15M at $60M post-money, with 1x non-participating liquidation preference. Founder asks: 'What does 1x non-participating mean at exit?'

Key point

Going Deeper — dilution math through Series A → B → C. A founder starts at 100% pre-financing. Series A: VC invests $5M at $20M post-money — the founder is diluted to $15M / $20M = 75%. Series B: a new investor leads with $10M at $50M post-money — every existing holder is diluted by the new-money fraction $10M / $50M = 20%, so the founder goes to 75% × (1 − 0.20) = 60%. Series C: $20M at $100M post-money — dilution factor $20M / $100M = 20%, founder lands at 60% × 0.80 = 48%. Under conventional terms, the founder owns slightly less than half after three rounds. The discipline: model the cap table forward to the round you expect to exit at, including option-pool refreshes (which dilute everyone before the new money enters), and only then judge whether the founder's ownership economics still incentivize the work that matters.

Check your understanding

Sit with the ideas.

A VC invested $25M at a $100M post-money (25% ownership) with 1x participating preferred. The company sells for $80M. How much does the VC receive?

Why:
Continue this lesson in the appAdaptive practice · saves your progress · remediation when you miss

Other lessons in this course.

  1. 01How Venture Capital Funds Work
  2. 02Pre-Money, Post-Money, and the Math of Ownership
  3. 03Term Sheets: What Founders Give Up and Investors Demand— reading now
  4. 04Preferred Stock, Dilution, and Cap Table Dynamics
  5. 05The VC Valuation Method: Pricing Companies Without Earnings
  6. 06The IPO Process: From Private to Public
  7. 07Evaluating Recently-IPO'd VC-Backed Companies
Continue this lesson in the app →See it on a real ticker →