PEG = P/E Ratio / Earnings Growth Rate (%)
| PEG range | Conventional read | Caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Below 1.0 | Potentially undervalued — the price is low relative to expected growth. | Check whether the growth rate is realistic. Cheap-looking PEG often signals analyst estimates that are too optimistic. |
| Around 1.0 | Fairly priced for its growth — the Lynch baseline. | Only meaningful if the growth rate is sustainable, not a one-year spike. |
| Above 1.5 | Pricing in growth more aggressively — the market expects a premium outcome. | Common for high-quality compounders. Not automatically a sell signal. |
| Negative or undefined | Use a different metric — PEG breaks when earnings are negative or growth is zero. | Early-stage and cyclical companies frequently fall here. |
PEG is only as good as the growth rate you feed it. Forward EPS — the analyst-consensus estimate for next year's earnings per share, as opposed to the trailing twelve-month figure — is an analyst estimate, and analyst estimates have known biases (too high near IPO, too low immediately after earnings beats). For a serious read, use a 3-to-5-year forward consensus (smooths the noise) or build your own growth model from revenue projections + margin assumptions. Trailing PEG (using last year's growth) is more conservative but lagged. Either way, PEG is a NORMALIZER, not a verdict — it's the first screen before the real work of judging whether the growth itself is durable.
PEG turns the P/E ratio into a growth-adjusted yardstick. Use it to compare stocks at different growth profiles within the same sector. Be skeptical of the growth rate input, and never use PEG alone — it's a screening tool that points you at which businesses deserve a closer look, not a verdict on intrinsic value.
Sit with the ideas.
Stock A trades at a P/E of 30 and grows earnings at 20% per year. Stock B trades at a P/E of 15 and grows earnings at 5% per year. Which stock has the lower PEG ratio?