Compare
| Layer | Cost | Covenants | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolving Credit | SOFR + 200–300 bps | Tightest (maintenance) | First priority (but undrawn) |
| Term Loan A | SOFR + 200–350 bps | Maintenance covenants | Senior secured |
| Term Loan B | SOFR + 300–500 bps | Incurrence only | Senior secured |
| Senior Notes | 6–8% fixed | Incurrence only | Senior unsecured |
| Mezzanine/Sub Notes | 10–14% | Minimal | Subordinated |
| Equity | 20–25% targeted IRR | None — residual claim | Last |
Key point
Maintenance covenants (tested quarterly) vs. incurrence covenants (tested only when taking new action) — this distinction is critical. Covenant-lite (cov-lite) deals with only incurrence covenants give borrowers more flexibility but less lender protection.
Try it
When reading about an LBO or leveraged loan, check whether the debt has maintenance or incurrence covenants. Cov-lite structures are more borrower-friendly but mean lenders have less early warning if things deteriorate.
Check-in
An LBO uses 4x senior secured, 2x subordinated, and 1x equity (7x total). If EBITDA drops 30%, which layer is at risk?
Key insight
Check-in
PE-backed company's capital stack: $500M senior secured debt (5% rate), $200M mezz (10% rate), $200M equity. Enterprise value $900M. Post-deal, EBITDA drops 20%. What's the 'danger tranche'?
Check your understanding
Sit with the ideas.
An LBO target has $150M EBITDA and $40M capex. The proposed debt structure is: $300M Term Loan at 7%, $200M Senior Notes at 9%, and $100M Mezzanine at 13%. Mandatory amortization is $30M/year. Can the company cover its debt service?
Why: