Fortna Group, Inc.
2 BDCs lend $31M to Fortna Group, Inc.; marks differ by as much as 85.5 points.
How each BDC lender prices its exposure to this borrower, from the latest SEC Schedule-of-Investments filings.
Figures as of the period ended 2026-09-30; filed 2026-11-05 to 2026-11-06.
Lenders
Fortna Group, Inc. is held by 2 BDC lenders in our parsed SEC filings: AGTC, CGBD.
Cross-lender loan pricing
Lenders mark this name differently
AGTC carries this first-lien exposure at 14.5 while CGBD marks it at 100.0 — a 85.5-point gap on the same lien class, both marked for the quarter ended 2026-09-30.
BDC marks are quarterly fair-value estimates. A gap this wide can reflect tranche mix within the same lien class, valuation timing, or genuine credit disagreement between the managers — it is a prompt to read both lenders’ filings, not a mispricing claim. Marks are fair value as a percent of par, FV-weighted where a lender holds multiple tranches.
Non-accrual divergence: 1 of 2 lenders report this borrower on non-accrual (AGTC). When lenders split on non-accrual status, the ones recognizing it first are often ahead of the credit. Non-accrual means the lender has stopped booking the loan’s interest as income because it doubts the interest will be paid.
Each row is one debt tranche at the BDC’s most recent filing that holds this borrower, widest spread first. Mark is the position’s fair value per 100 of par (100 = par). Spread is shown in basis points over the benchmark in the Rate column, normalized from each filing’s as-reported units — rows quoting different benchmarks are still not directly comparable. Compare like-for-like: a second-lien tranche, a different vintage, or an older filing should price wider even when the credit view is identical — check the Seniority and As of columns before reading a gap as disagreement. Source: SEC EDGAR (public).
Marks are per 100 of par, current lenders only. Rows tagged “unfunded” or “n/m, not a price” are listed but left out of every average, range and comparison; a mark tagged “above 105, as filed” is shown but left out too.
| BDC | Seniority | Rate | Cash spread (bps) | Mark | Fair value | Maturity | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGTC | First lien | SOFR PIK 7.50% | 750 spread as filed, may include PIK | n/m, not a price | $2M | Aug 2027 | 2026-09-30filed 2026-11-06 |
| AGTC | First lien | SOFR PIK 2.75% | 750 spread as filed, may include PIK | n/m, not a price | $481K | Aug 2027 | 2026-09-30filed 2026-11-06 |
| AGTC | First lien | SOFR PIK 11.23% | 750 spread as filed, may include PIK | n/m, not a price | $199K | Aug 2027 | 2026-09-30filed 2026-11-06 |
| CGBD | First lien | SOFR PIK 1.00% | 750 spread as filed, may include PIK | 100.0 | $728K | Aug 2027 | 2026-09-30filed 2026-11-05 |
| AGTC non-accrual | First lien | — | 14.5 | $4M | Jun 2029 | 2026-09-30filed 2026-11-06 |
Marks reflect each BDC’s own fair-value estimates as reported to the SEC, not traded prices. Private-credit loans are predominantly Level 3 under ASC 820 — valued from unobservable inputs and determined in good faith under the oversight of each BDC’s board (often by the adviser as valuation designee), so figures are estimates as of the period end each filing reports, not its filing date, and are not directly comparable across managers. Informational only; not investment advice or a valuation.
Reading this table
When two business development companies lend to the same borrower, comparing how each marks the loan is a starting question, not a verdict. In plain English: a wider spread (e.g. SOFR + 575 vs SOFR + 525 bps) or a lower mark (e.g. 96 vs 100 cents on the dollar) can mean that lender is pricing in more risk — but marks can also differ for reasons other than a credit view: a different tranche (second lien should price wider than first lien on the same company), a different vintage or entry point, an older filing date, or each manager’s own fair-value methodology. Compare like-for-like — check the Seniority and As of columns before reading a gap as disagreement. Each row is one debt position at one BDC’s most recent filing. Source: SEC EDGAR Schedule of Investments (public).
Terms in this table: SOFR (the floating benchmark most of these loans pay over); spread in basis points (bps; 100 bps is one percentage point); first lien and second lien; PIK (interest paid in more debt instead of cash); non-accrual; par (the face amount owed); and Level 3 fair value (a manager’s own estimate, not a market price). Also: mark (fair value per 100 of par, the lender's own estimate); seniority (where a position ranks for repayment); unfunded commitment (money promised but not yet drawn); basis point (one hundredth of a percentage point).
Want to read these numbers like an analyst? Free Oxford Ledge lessons: reading a BDC’s Schedule of Investments, key credit metrics, and the Five Cs of credit analysis.
Compare more borrowers: every borrower held by two or more BDCs, or start from a BDC’s full portfolio.
Other borrowers
Held by the same BDCs
Borrowers in the newest filings of two or more of the BDCs that hold this one, most shared first.
Same industry: Technology Hardware and Equipment
Borrowers held by two or more BDCs under the same industry label, most holders first.
Holder counts here are the borrower index’s. Or see the borrowers held most widely across BDCs.