Chase Industries, Inc.
Chase Industries, which trades as Senneca Holdings, designs and manufactures specialty doors and enclosures for commercial and industrial buildings: the swinging impact doors used in restaurant and supermarket kitchens, cold-storage and freezer doors, corrosion-resistant and fire-rated doors, strip curtains, and containment enclosures for data centres and other controlled environments. It was founded in 1932 and is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, and it sells through a family of brands including Chase Doors, Eliason, Chem-Pruf, ColdGuard, Curtron and Subzero Engineering. The private-equity firm Audax formed the Senneca platform around Chase Industries in 2014 and sold it to the private-equity firm Kohlberg & Company in 2018.
Company profile. Written by an AI model from public web sources; not checked for copying; not taken from the company's or the lender's SEC filing. — distinct from the SEC Schedule-of-Investments pricing data below. · AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. May contain errors.
Lenders
Chase Industries, Inc. is held by 6 BDC lenders in our parsed SEC filings: BCSF, GBDC, GSBD, GSEC, NCDL, OCSL.
Cross-lender loan pricing
Non-accrual divergence: 2 of 4 lenders report this borrower on non-accrual (GSBD, GSEC). When lenders split on non-accrual status, the ones recognizing it first are often ahead of the credit.
Each row is one debt tranche at the BDC’s most recent filing that holds this borrower, widest spread first. Mark is the position’s fair value as a percent of par (100 = par). Spread is shown in basis points over the benchmark in the Rate column, normalized from each filing’s as-reported units — rows quoting different benchmarks are still not directly comparable. Compare like-for-like: a second-lien tranche, a different vintage, or an older filing should price wider even when the credit view is identical — check the Type and Filing columns before reading a gap as disagreement. Source: SEC EDGAR (public). Rows marked stale are from an earlier filing than the lender’s latest — the borrower is absent from its newest filing (exited, repaid, or reported under a different name).
| BDC | Type | Rate | Cash spread (bps) | Mark (% of par) | Fair Value | Maturity | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCDL | 1L Sr Secured | SOFR | 500 | 99.0 | $99K | 2029-11-11 | 2026-08-06 |
| OCSL | 1L Sr Secured | SOFR | 500 | 83.1 | $69K | 2029-05-11 | 2026-08-05 |
| OCSL | 1L Sr Secured | SOFR | 500 | 98.7 | $6M | 2029-05-11 | 2026-08-05 |
| GSBD non-accrual | 2L / Mezz | PIK | — | 90.0 | $14M | 2029-11-12 | 2026-08-06 |
| GSBD | 2L / Mezz | FIXED | — | 97.0 | $16M | 2029-11-12 | 2026-08-06 |
| GSEC | 2L / Mezz | PIK | — | 97.0 | $17M | 2029-11-12 | 2026-08-11 |
| GSEC non-accrual | 2L / Mezz | PIK | — | 90.0 | $15M | 2029-11-12 | 2026-08-11 |
| GBDC | 1L Sr Secured | PIK | 700 | 99.0 | $13M | 2026-11 | 2026-05-04 stale |
| GBDC | 1L Sr Secured | PIK | 700 | 99.0 | $1M | 2026-11 | 2026-05-04 stale |
| GBDC | 1L Sr Secured | PIK | 625 | 95.0 | $114K | 2026-11 | 2026-05-04 stale |
| BCSF | 1L Sr Secured | PIK | 565 | 99.0 | $27M | 2027-11-11 | 2026-05-11 stale |
| BCSF | 1L Sr Secured | PIK | 565 | 99.0 | $3M | 2027-11-11 | 2026-05-11 stale |
| BCSF | 1L Sr Secured | PIK | 565 | 97.1 | $612K | 2027-11-11 | 2026-05-11 stale |
Marks reflect each BDC’s own fair-value estimates as reported to the SEC, not traded prices. Private-credit loans are predominantly Level 3 under ASC 820 — valued from unobservable inputs and determined in good faith under the oversight of each BDC’s board (often by the adviser as valuation designee), so figures are estimates as of the period end each filing reports, not its filing date, and are not directly comparable across managers. Informational only; not investment advice or a valuation.
Ownership & deal activity
Headlines mentioning Chase Industries, Inc.
Reading this table
When two business development companies lend to the same borrower, comparing how each marks the loan is a starting question, not a verdict. In plain English: a wider spread (e.g. S+575 vs S+525) or a lower mark (e.g. 96 vs 100 cents on the dollar) can mean that lender is pricing in more risk — but marks can also differ for reasons other than a credit view: a different tranche (second lien should price wider than first lien on the same company), a different vintage or entry point, an older filing date, or each manager’s own fair-value methodology. Compare like-for-like — check the Type and Filing columns before reading a gap as disagreement. Each row is one debt position at one BDC’s most recent filing. Source: SEC EDGAR Schedule of Investments (public).
Want to read these numbers like an analyst? Free Oxford Ledge lessons: reading a BDC’s Schedule of Investments, key credit metrics, and the Five Cs of credit analysis.