Acumatica Holdings, Inc.
Cloud and browser-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) software vendor serving small and medium-sized businesses with true-cloud SaaS ERP and business-management solutions.
Company profile compiled from public sources (company filings, rating-agency reports, and press releases) — distinct from the SEC Schedule-of-Investments pricing data below.
Lenders
Acumatica Holdings, Inc. is held by 2 BDC lenders in our parsed SEC filings: BXSL, NMFC.
Cross-lender loan pricing
Each row is one debt tranche at the BDC’s most recent filing that holds this borrower, widest spread first. Mark is the position’s fair value as a percent of par (100 = par). Spread is shown in basis points over the benchmark in the Rate column, normalized from each filing’s as-reported units — rows quoting different benchmarks are still not directly comparable. Compare like-for-like: a second-lien tranche, a different vintage, or an older filing should price wider even when the credit view is identical — check the Type and Filing columns before reading a gap as disagreement. Source: SEC EDGAR (public).
| BDC | Type | Rate | Cash spread (bps) | Mark (% of par) | Fair Value | Maturity | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BXSL | 1L Sr Secured | SOFR | 450 | 97.6 | $11M | 2032-07-28 | 2026-08-06 |
| NMFC | 1L Sr Secured | SOFR | 450 | 99.7 | $14M | 2032-07 | 2026-08-03 |
| NMFC | 1L Sr Secured | — | — | -$31K | 2032-07 | 2026-08-03 |
Marks reflect each BDC’s own fair-value estimates as reported to the SEC, not traded prices. Private-credit loans are predominantly Level 3 under ASC 820 — valued from unobservable inputs and determined in good faith by each BDC’s board, so figures are estimates as of the filing date and are not directly comparable across managers. Informational only; not investment advice or a valuation.
Ownership & deal activity
Headlines mentioning Acumatica Holdings, Inc.
Public headlines that name Acumatica Holdings, Inc., matched by company name and shown most-recent first. A mention is not an endorsement, a rating, or investment advice — verify anything material against the original source. Source: Google News.
- Acumatica Beacon: Your New Hub for Acumatica Knowledge
- AI Automation in Acumatica: Practical Control, Security, and Consistency
- Aqurus Solutions, Gold Certified Acumatica Partner, Secures Global Top 1% Ranking for High-Participation ERP Implementation
- Nectari Software Strengthens Strategic Partnership with Acumatica
- Agriculture Firms Reap AI and Technology Advancements with Acumatica Cloud ERP
- When Homegrown Financial Systems Can’t Scale: Why Manufacturers Are Turning to Acumatica
- Cloud firm Acumatica bares 3-year plan for PH expansion
- HIA Named Acumatica's Official Hospitality Partner, Cementing Its Position as the Definitive ERP Solution for the Hotel Industry
Reading this table
When two business development companies lend to the same borrower, comparing how each marks the loan is a starting question, not a verdict. In plain English: a wider spread (e.g. S+575 vs S+525) or a lower mark (e.g. 96 vs 100 cents on the dollar) can mean that lender is pricing in more risk — but marks can also differ for reasons other than a credit view: a different tranche (second lien should price wider than first lien on the same company), a different vintage or entry point, an older filing date, or each manager’s own fair-value methodology. Compare like-for-like — check the Type and Filing columns before reading a gap as disagreement. Each row is one debt position at one BDC’s most recent filing. Source: SEC EDGAR Schedule of Investments (public).
Want to read these numbers like an analyst? Free Oxford Ledge lessons: reading a BDC’s Schedule of Investments, key credit metrics, and the Five Cs of credit analysis.