Skip to main content Skip to main content
Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.5 · INTERMEDIATE · 2 MIN

From Concept to Pitch: The Workflow Most Analysts Actually Use

An idea is not yet a pitch, and a pitch is not yet a position. Between "this looks interesting" and "I am long 3% of the portfolio" sits a workflow with five to seven explicit stages. Most ideas die somewhere in the middle of that workflow, and that is the workflow working as designed.

Quiz · 5 questions ↓

The five-to-seven stages of the workflow

Five to seven stages, depending on the shop. The minimum spine is: (1) idea capture, (2) first-look screen, (3) preliminary memo, (4) full diligence, (5) pitch to committee, (6) position-build, (7) post-mortem after exit. A retail investor running their own portfolio can compress (1)-(2) and (5)-(6), but cannot skip the kill-criteria check at (3) without ceding the discipline the workflow exists to enforce.

Where ideas die at each stage

StageTime on ideaReaderWhere ideas die
1. Idea capture10 minutesAnalyst onlyFiled in a notebook and forgotten — most ideas stop here
2. First-look screen2-4 hoursAnalyst onlyNumbers don't survive a basic ratio + balance sheet check
3. Preliminary memo (1 page)4-8 hoursAnalyst + one senior readerKill criteria fire; thesis turns out to be already-in-price
4. Full diligence1-3 weeksAnalyst + 1-2 senior readersPrimary research contradicts the early framing
5. Pitch to committee1 hour live + days of prepFull investment committeeCommittee surfaces a hidden risk or a sizing problem
6. Position-buildDays to weeksTrading desk + PMLiquidity or price action shifts the entry math
7. Post-mortem1-2 hours after exitAnalyst + committeeLearnings get written down so the next idea benefits

Kill criteria: the workflow's load-bearing element

Kill criteria are the load-bearing element. At Stage 3 — the one-page preliminary memo — the analyst names three to five specific findings that would END the work on the idea. Examples: "if Q3 segment growth is below 12%, this thesis is wrong"; "if the new product launch is delayed past March, the catalyst window closes." Kill criteria are written BEFORE the diligence work begins, so the analyst cannot retroactively explain away contradicting evidence.

Worked example: Sentry Logistics through the workflow

Worked example — Sentry Logistics (fictional regional trucking, $14 share). The analyst captures the idea Monday after reading an industry note. Tuesday the first-look screen shows debt-to-EBITDA 4.2x — within tolerance — and operating margins expanding 200 bps YoY. Wednesday she writes a 1-page memo: thesis is that fuel-cost normalization plus regional consolidation drives 25% EBITDA growth; kill criteria are (a) Q1 fuel hedge expiration not renewed, (b) any covenant amendment indicating refi pressure, (c) DOT inspection backlog exceeding 30 days. Two of three are checkable from public filings in an afternoon; the third needs a call with a freight broker. By Friday she has signed off on the kill criteria as not yet triggered, and she promotes the idea to full diligence with explicit gates.

The senior reader's response to a weak memo

An analyst's preliminary memo on Crestline Tools lists "the stock should work over the long term" as the only thesis statement and no kill criteria. The senior reader's first action should be:

A healthy kill rate is 60 to 80 percent

Most ideas die at Stage 3, and that is the system functioning correctly. An analyst who never kills an idea at the preliminary-memo stage either has unusually strong taste — rare — or is rationalizing rather than reasoning. Track the kill rate. A healthy one is 60-80% of ideas killed before Stage 4.

Check your understanding

Sit with the ideas.

An analyst has a rough idea on Sentry Logistics that they think is interesting. Which of the following is the strongest reason to take the idea through the full pitch workflow rather than just opening a small position immediately?

Why:
Continue this lesson in the app →See it on a real ticker →