| Capital tier | What counts | Regulatory minimum |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1) | Common stock + retained earnings | 4.5% of RWA, plus buffers (typically ~8-11% all-in) |
| Additional Tier 1 | Preferred stock, contingent convertibles | Counted in total Tier 1 (6% minimum) |
| Tier 2 | Subordinated debt, certain reserves | Counted in total capital (8% minimum) |
| Risk-Weighted Assets | Assets adjusted for credit and market risk | Treasuries weighted near zero; risky loans up to 150% |
CET1 is the ratio that matters most. It captures the highest-quality, most loss-absorbing form of capital — common equity. When a bank's CET1 ratio falls below the regulatory floor plus its specific buffer, dividends and buybacks get restricted automatically. When it falls further, the bank must shrink lending or raise new equity (dilutive to existing shareholders).
| Stress test | Who runs it | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| CCAR | Federal Reserve, annual | Capital adequacy under severely adverse macro scenarios for the largest US banks |
| DFAST | Federal Reserve, annual | Same supervisory scenarios as CCAR; broader bank population |
| Internal stress tests | Each bank's risk team | Tail-risk scenarios specific to the bank's portfolio and geography |
What stress tests miss: they model the scenarios regulators pick, with the assumptions regulators make. The 2023 regional-bank failures were triggered by deposit-velocity dynamics that no pre-2023 stress scenario captured. A clean stress-test result reduces — but does not eliminate — the probability of bank failure. Pair the ratio with a look at deposit composition, unrealized losses on held-to-maturity securities, and concentration of large depositors.
Sit with the ideas.
A large US bank passes its annual CCAR stress test with a stressed CET1 minimum of 7.2 percent — comfortably above the 4.5 percent regulatory floor and the bank's stress capital buffer. Press coverage calls the result a 'clean pass.' What does that actually prove about the bank's safety?