When one company invests in another, the accounting treatment depends on the level of influence. Three ownership thresholds govern three different methods — and each produces dramatically different financial statements for the same underlying economic reality.
Under the equity method, reported income is based on the investee’s net income, NOT on cash received. If the investee earns $100M and pays no dividends, the 30% owner records $30M in income but receives $0 in cash.
§ 03
Find a company with equity method investments (energy, conglomerates, Japanese trading houses). Look for ‘Equity method income’ on the income statement and check the footnotes for the investee’s debt levels.
§ 04
A conglomerate reports $80M in equity method income from a 40% JV that paid no dividends. The JV has $1.2B in debt. What’s concerning?
§ 05
The consolidation cliff between 49% and 51% ownership is enormous. Two companies with identical economics but slightly different ownership structures can report vastly different revenue, debt levels, and asset bases.
§ 06
Company A owns 25% of Company B. How is this investment reported, and why might the equity method understate economic exposure?
Five questions · AI feedback
●○○○○
Sit with the ideas.
A conglomerate owns 40% of a joint venture that reported $200M in net income but paid no dividends this year. The conglomerate's income statement shows $80M in 'equity method income.' Meanwhile, the JV's footnote disclosure reveals it has $1.2B in debt. What should concern you?