Skip to main content Skip to main content
Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.5 · INTERMEDIATE · 3 MIN

Annual Reviews and Portfolio Drift Monitoring

The annual review is where the IPS earns its keep. Every other year of the relationship is execution; the annual review is the structured moment to ask whether the original plan still fits the client's life, whether the portfolio has drifted off-mandate, and whether tax or estate events have shifted the playing field. A bad annual review reads like a market commentary. A good one reads like an audit against a written contract.

Quiz · 5 questions ↓
§ 01
Review areaWhat to checkWhat action it can trigger
Asset allocation driftCurrent % weights vs IPS targets and bandsRebalance (tax-aware in taxable accounts); document if you chose to stay drifted within band
Tax-loss harvest opportunitiesPositions trading below cost basis in taxable accountsRealize loss; rotate into substitute exposure (avoid wash sale per IRC Section 1091)
Life events affecting the planMarriage / divorce / new child / new job / inheritance / health changeUpdate IPS, beneficiaries, contribution targets, time horizon, risk capacity
Tax-bracket optimizationCurrent marginal rate vs likely retirement rate; Roth-conversion windowPartial Roth conversions; harvest gains in 0% LTCG band; bunch deductions
Estate updatesBeneficiary designations, will/trust, DPOA, HIPAA forms (post-age-18 child)Re-execute documents on title changes / status changes
§ 02

Rebalancing is mechanical AND behavioral. Mechanically, you're returning the portfolio to its target risk profile. Behaviorally, you're forcing yourself (or the client) to sell what just outperformed and buy what just underperformed — the exact opposite of momentum-chasing. Studies (notably Vanguard 2015) find that the bands matter more than the schedule: a 5% threshold rebalance captures most of the discipline benefit with fewer transactions than quarterly calendar rebalancing.

§ 03

Use the annual review to renegotiate the IPS, not just measure against it. A 45-year-old's IPS from age 35 is probably obsolete: time horizon shortened, risk capacity changed, tax bracket moved. The IPS is a living document. When you update it, document WHY in writing — that's the audit trail that protects both the client and the advisor in a future drawdown when the client doesn't remember agreeing to the risk level.

§ 04
Open the **Portfolio** view. Compare current weights to your stated allocation. If any position has drifted more than 5 percentage points off target, that's a candidate for an annual-review rebalance. In a taxable account, also look at unrealized gains/losses per position — the loss positions are the cheapest to rebalance from.
§ 05

Avoid the rebalancing trap in concentrated-position situations. If a client holds vested company stock that has run hard (Section 83(b) tech-employee classic), 'rebalance back to target' may mean realizing a 7-figure capital gain that the client can't fund the tax on. The right answer is usually a multi-year sell-down plan executed via 10b5-1 or charitable-remainder structures — not a single-year liquidation that triggers AMT or hits the 20% LTCG + 3.8% NIIT brackets all at once.

§ 06

Schedule the annual review. Run the five checks above against the IPS. Rebalance when the bands say to, not when the market 'feels' a certain way. Update the IPS document for life events. The discipline is the deliverable — what separates a professional from a friend who happens to read finance news.

Five questions · AI feedback

Sit with the ideas.

A client's IPS targets 60% equities / 40% bonds with a +/-5 percentage-point rebalancing band. After a strong equity year, the portfolio drifts to 68% equities / 32% bonds. What does the advisor do at the annual review?

Why:
See it on a real ticker →