Skip to main content Skip to main content
Not investment advice. Educational reading. See Disclaimer.
L.3 · INTERMEDIATE · 3 MIN

Commodities and Futures: The Storage-Cost Asset Class

Commodities are the asset class where the futures curve, not the spot price, drives returns for most investors. Unlike stocks (which pay dividends) or bonds (which pay coupons), commodities have a NEGATIVE carry built into their structure: storing oil, copper, or grain costs money, and the futures price reflects that storage cost. Understanding contango and backwardation is the difference between a useful inflation hedge and a slow-bleed position.

Quiz · 5 questions ↓
§ 01
Curve shapeWhat it meansEffect on commodity ETF
ContangoFutures price > spot (typical for storable commodities like oil/grain/copper)ETF loses roll yield each cycle -- can erode 5-15% annually in steep contango
BackwardationFutures price < spot (typical for short-supply commodities and seasonal-demand commodities)ETF gains positive roll yield -- enhances returns above the spot-price move
Flat curveFutures price ~ spot across maturitiesRoll yield is roughly zero -- ETF return tracks spot move minus fees
§ 02

The 2020 crude oil collapse is the canonical case study. Spot crude went negative (-$37/barrel for the May 2020 contract on April 20, 2020) because storage capacity at Cushing, Oklahoma, was full. The USO ETF, which holds front-month futures, had to roll into June at a much higher price -- locking in the loss. Crude spot recovered to $40+ within a few months, but USO had structurally damaged its NAV through contango losses. Investors who held USO 'to play the recovery' lost money even as oil went back up.

§ 03

For investors wanting commodity exposure WITHOUT the futures-roll problem, the alternatives are: (1) physical-holding ETFs for precious metals (GLD, SLV -- gold/silver have low storage cost relative to value), (2) commodity-producer equities (energy E&P, mining stocks), (3) structured products that smooth across multiple futures maturities (DBC uses an optimized roll strategy). Each has tradeoffs: producer equities add operating leverage and management risk; physical-metal ETFs have storage fees (typically 25-50 bps); optimized-roll ETFs reduce but don't eliminate contango drag.

§ 04
Open the **Ticker** view for USO (oil) or DBA (agriculture) -- two well-known commodity ETFs. Compare the 5-year ETF chart to the underlying commodity's spot price chart (oil spot for USO, agricultural-commodity index for DBA). The gap between the two is roll yield and fees combined. The gap widens during steep-contango periods.
§ 05

Commodity-futures ETFs are usually a POOR long-term inflation hedge despite the marketing. The contango drag erodes returns over multi-year holding periods even when commodity prices rise. The empirical evidence (Erb and Harvey 2006; Gorton and Rouwenhorst 2006) shows commodity-futures indices have underperformed equity inflation hedges by 2-4% per year since 2000. If you want inflation protection, TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) and equities of pricing-power companies have outperformed commodity futures over the past 20 years. Commodity exposure is a tactical play, not a strategic allocation, for most investors.

§ 06

Commodities have negative carry baked into the structure. Contango drags commodity-futures ETF returns; backwardation enhances them. The 2020 USO collapse is the case study for misunderstanding this. For long-term portfolio inflation hedging, TIPS and pricing-power equities have empirically beaten commodity futures. Use commodity ETFs tactically, not strategically.

Five questions · AI feedback

Sit with the ideas.

A commodity ETF tracking crude oil futures returned -8% over a year where the spot price of crude was actually flat. What is the most likely explanation?

Why:
See it on a real ticker →